![intel burn test 4790k intel burn test 4790k](https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/13305369.jpg)
“High” indicates that all “graphics” tab settings were configured to high across the board.
![intel burn test 4790k intel burn test 4790k](https://i0.wp.com/www.skooterblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/IMG_5128.jpg)
Tests conducted with Very High / Ultra settings were maxed-out on all “graphics” tab options, sans AA advanced graphics tab options were off for these tests. Anti-aliasing was disabled in all forms, sans FXAA, which we've proven to have effectively zero impact on performance. “Advanced Graphics” settings were applied to the “MAX” settings benchmark below. Water quality, for instance, will more severely impact FPS if swimming in the ocean rather than just flying over it or near it. Note that more “situational” settings may not be reflected perfectly in our bench. This valley showcases nearly every setting in action – grass, water, view distance and scaling, reflections, shadows, and real-time night/day cycling for dynamic lighting effects. The 270X was used for illustration of a more likely user scenario.Īll tests were conducted using the benchmarking utility – we opted to record only the portion where the fighter jet travels through the valley. The Titan X was used to enforce a CPU bottleneck in as many scenarios as possible. Tests were conducted on an identical configuration with either a Titan X or R9 270X, swapping only the motherboard and CPU for each test. Instead, we take an average of the lowest 1% of results (1% low) to show real-world, noticeable dips we then take an average of the lowest 0.1% of results for severe spikes. We do not measure maximum or minimum FPS results as we consider these numbers to be pure outliers.
![intel burn test 4790k intel burn test 4790k](https://cmcdistribution.com.vn/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Intel-i7-4790K-i5-4690K-in-2020-Benchmarks-vs-Ryzen-3600.jpg)
GN Test Bench 2015ĪSRock Fatal1ty 990FXSRock Fatal1ty 990FXĪverage FPS, 1% low, and 0.1% low times are measured. FPS measurements were taken using FRAPS and then analyzed with FRAFS.įPS logs were analyzed using FRAFS, then added to an internal spreadsheet for further analysis.Įach game was tested for 30 seconds in an identical scenario on the cards, then repeated for parity. Parity checking was performed with GPU-Z. VRAM utilization was measured using in-game tools and then validated with MSI's Afterburner, a custom version of the Riva Tuner software. Overclocking was neither applied nor tested, though stock GPU overclocks (“superclocks”) were left untouched. Game settings were manually controlled for the DUT. AMD's 15.4 Catalyst Beta was used for its GTA improvements.
Intel burn test 4790k driver#
The latest 350.12 GeForce driver was used during testing. Our thanks to supporting hardware vendors for supplying some of the test components. We tested using our updated 2015 test bench, detailed in the table below. The Complete Graphics Optimization Guide.